Benghazi probe can't get sidetracked
Written by
Diana
West
It is neither “racist” nor “sexist” to question U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s role in the Benghazi scandal. It is, however, almost entirely beside the point.
Rice wasn’t making life-and-death decisions on Sept. 11, 2012, when the U.S. compound in the Libyan city of Benghazi came under attack; President Barack Obama was. Rice, therefore, is unable to answer the all-important question about what order Obama issued upon hearing U.S. diplomats in Benghazi were under fire.
She can’t look America in the eye and answer whether the U.S. military was ordered not to rescue Americans fighting for their lives.
Nor is Rice likely to be the Obama administration official who first concocted the false narrative blaming a YouTube video for a protest in Benghazi.
Another key piece of the puzzle Rice is unlikely to possess is why Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, three days after the Benghazi attack, was out there flogging that same concocted story, as when Clinton tried to console the father of slain ex-SEAL Tyrone Wood by promising him the video’s producer would be arrested and prosecuted. Further, it is unlikely Susan Rice can explain why CIA Director David Petraeus went before the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 14 in a closed session and similarly lied, deceiving members into believing that an “unplanned” attack left four Americans, including an American ambassador, dead.
These are just some of the red flags regarding Benghazi that never can be checked if GOP Sens. John McCain, of Arizona, Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina, and Kelly Ayotte, of New Hampshire,continue to monopolize the issue and focus solely on Rice and those not-all-that-interesting talking points.
It’s almost as if they want to tighten the lens regarding Benghazi so closely that we never notice that what’s really needed is a review of the administration’s Arab Spring policies. Maybe that’s because the GOP largely supported these same disastrous policies, too.
Here are some of the Benghazi questions that still demand answers:
Who came up with the administration plan to discard early intelligence confirming the U.S. had sustained an al-Qaida-linked terrorist attack in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11 and to seize on a lie blaming a YouTube video for the attack? Who got everyone — White House, State, CIA (but not, it seems, Defense) — on board? After the president addressed the United Nations on Sept. 25 (citing thevideo six times), the false video narrative peters out. Who called the whole thing off?
Read More http://www.coshoctontribune.com/article/20121201/OPINION/312010010/Benghazi-probe-can-t-get-sidetracked
Related Story
Susan Rice explains role in WH decision-making; ‘People know not to mess with me’
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/30/in-interview-susan-rice-explains-role-in-wh-decision-making-people-know-not-to-mess-with-me/#ixzz2Dq9hX2qX
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/30/in-interview-susan-rice-explains-role-in-wh-decision-making-people-know-not-to-mess-with-me/#ixzz2Dq9hX2qX
No comments:
Post a Comment